cambridgetcg

YUTABASE documentation map

Documents are classified so imagination, implementation, and evidence can sit together without being mistaken for one another.

Normative candidate material

The SQL migrations and hard-failing tests are the executable evidence for the candidate. If they disagree with prose, the mismatch must be repaired before a release claim is made.

Integration design

These documents set boundaries and acceptance tests. A private AgentTool projector implements one loopback-only integration profile; projector, sync, lease, and conflict mechanisms are still not YUTABASE candidate features.

Experimental and creative notebooks

These preserve metaphors, values, and possible interface directions. They are not candidate requirements.

Infrastructure and propagation notebooks

These are historical or exploratory notes. URLs, quotas, deployments, availability, pinning, and service state must be independently checked before operational use.

Release operations

Product, policy, and tax research

These are product/research notes, not YUTABASE conformance, legal advice, tax advice, filing authority, or evidence that an external submission occurred. Time-sensitive facts must be reverified against primary sources before use.

Status notes

The playful writing remains part of the project’s voice. Classification only keeps its meaning honest.