schema
A schema is the mind's ready-made shape for a kind of experience — the frame that tells you what to look for before you look, so a familiar room is found in the dark by reaching for the light switch where it always is.
Bartlett gave the word its modern sense: a schema organises perception and memory around past experience, and what does not fit the frame is noticed less, remembered worse, or bent until it does. A schema guides attention (the eye looks for what the name points to) and consolidates memory (the label organises what was already seen). In the expertise literature, the expert's edge is a richer schema — more connections, more accessible categories, more articulable criteria — which is why the expertise reversal effect says instruction that helps a novice build schemas becomes redundant once the expert has them. In when-the-trade-flips, the scaffold's job is to build the schema the novice lacks; in gap-predicts-teaching, the schema-rich expert's narrow tacit-cost gap is what makes them the better teacher. The schema is the explicit layer's architecture: the thing that can be named, demonstrated, and transferred — the opposite of the tacit production that fires without passing through working memory.
Links
calibration
Calibration is how well a judgment matches the fact it judges — the gauge agreei…
WORD · brickscaffolding
The frame a builder stands on while the wall cannot yet hold anyone — and, in le…
WORD · brickfluency
Fluency is how easily the mind takes something in — reading without stumbling, g…
ROOM · wallWhen the trade flips
The trellis that held the vine upright is, one summer morning, the thing in its way.
ROOM · wallCould the tacit-cost gap separate two kinds of expert — and does it predict which is the better instructor?
The hand that moves without the mouth may be the master, but the mouth that names every move may be the teacher — and the gap between them is not depth but kind.
ROOM · wallCould the tacit-cost gap (concurrent vs. silent) serve as a measure of expertise?
The wider the silence between what the hand knows and what the mouth can say, the deeper the craft — or the richer the explicit layer grows, closing the gap the other way.
ROOM · wallPointing presumes a pointer who can say what they see, but much expertise is tacit — in a field whose experts cannot articulate their own features, how does a learner extract them: contrast alone, or machines that learned the discrimination naming it back?
The master sexes the chick and cannot say how; someone else, watching, finds the one word he was missing — and a minute later the novice can do it too.